Categorized | Featured, News

Whole Foods Might Be Ugly

Posted on 28 February 2009

wholefoodzwhite1

The revised plans for the Whole Foods/apartment complex being built at Haight and Staynan are now completed and were presented to the Planning Commission, despite some vocal concerns from the neighborhood residents over parking and aesthetics .

The Haight Ashbury Neighborhood Council, which has traditionally crusaded to preserve the feeling of the neighborhood and community along Haight Street, opposed the original plans, including the three-story underground parking structure.

HANC cited increased parking may escalate traffic congestion on Haight Street and deteriorate the LOS (Level of Service) available to public transportation, bicycle, and foot traffic in the area. HANC has also voiced concerns about the questionable business ethics of the Whole Foods Corporation, alluding to the company’s anti-union track record.

HANC’s opposition was overruled by the Board prior to this final presentation. However the Board did take HANC’s concerns into consideration and required subsequent design modifications to the complex’s original layout. The project’s newly revised plans include the implementation of a “No Parking” sign north of the imminent building, designated short term loading/unloading spaces along both Staynan and Haight street, and the installation of a flashing light and audible sign to indicate when vehicles are leaving the garage.

The redrawn report by the Whole Foods Corporation stated that these measures are intended “to reduce conflicts between vehicles exiting the garage and pedestrians.” There was an informational presentation divulging the redrawn plans on February 26th at 1:30 in the Planning Commission building. Members of the public were invited to attend this meeting for more information and for the opportunity to express their opinions.

Ted Lowenberg, President of the Haight Ashbury Improvement Association, commented after this presentation that he was ”astounded at the current rendering of this building” in comparision to the architural design originally presented. He said that the redrawn plans had the “Lego-look of a square,” were “unimaginative” and “inappropriate to our neighborhood.” He suggeted that the design plans continue to be refigured on the basis of continued dialouge between the project’s planners and the community. The planning commission did not respond to the comments concerning the project’s aesthetics and instead proceeded to discuss the particulars of parking and loading regulations alongside Staynan Street.  
 
Senior Planner of the San Francisco Planning Department, Jonas Ionin, described the presentation as an opportunity for the planning commission to “advise and suggest” to the project’s builders on the redrawn plans.This meeting was not intended to implicate any further alterations to the project’s proposal itself, the council’s initial approval withstanding. Ionin went further to say that “no action” upon such suggestions will be required on the part of the Whole Foods operators. “It’s really an informational update,” said Ionin. “We’ve received the plans…and we’re satisfied with that.”

Comments are closed.